ScienceDaily (Feb. 5, 2010) — Important new research about the effects of acupuncture on the brain may provide an understanding of the complex mechanisms of acupuncture and could lead to a wider acceptability of the treatment.
The study, by researchers at the University of York and the Hull York Medical School published in Brain Research, indicates that acupuncture has a significant effect on specific neural structures. When a patient receives acupuncture treatment, a sensation called deqi can be obtained; scientific analysis shows that this deactivates areas within the brain that are associated with the processing of pain.
Dr Hugh MacPherson, of the Complementary Medicine Research Group in the University's Department of Health Sciences, says: "These results provide objective scientific evidence that acupuncture has specific effects within the brain which hopefully will lead to a better understanding of how acupuncture works."
Neuroscientist Dr Aziz Asghar, of the York Neuroimaging Centre and the Hull York Medical School, adds: "The results are fascinating. Whether such brain deactivations constitute a mechanism which underlies or contributes to the therapeutic effect of acupuncture is an intriguing possibility which requires further research."
Last summer, following research conducted in York, acupuncture was recommended for the first time by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as a treatment option for NHS patients with lower back pain. NICE guidelines now state that GPs should 'consider offering a course of acupuncture comprising a maximum of 10 sessions over a period of up to 12 weeks' for patients with this common condition.
Current clinical trials at the University of York are investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and for depression. Recent studies in the US have also shown that acupuncture can be an effective treatment for migraines and osteoarthritis of the knee.
The York team believe that the new research could help to clear the way for acupuncture to be more broadly accepted as a treatment option on the NHS for a number of medical conditions.
My Comment: Studies on acupuncture tend to bring out the worst qualities in science, which can be corrected only by each individual. Not each individual scientist. Each regular, normal, lay person. All we need to do is buy a book about acupuncture, such as The Web that has No Weaver, and read it. Or, we can make an appointment with an acupuncturist and ask them what they do and why it works. Or we can make a phone call to an acupuncturist and ask the same questions. These are steps scientists will not take. And that’s because Chinese medicine works on another paradigm, and one thing we know about Western institutions, they will not tinker with the paradigm unless they absolutely have to. Biologists must describe everything biologically or chemically. They don’t describe things energetically, like the physicists, unless, again, they absolutely have to. So here is another in a long list of studies saying that acupuncture is effective, and explained in chemical terms. It’s just narrow minded science. It’s like the old joke about a guy looking for something on the ground of a lighted parking lot. What are you looking for, some other guy asks. My car keys, is the reply. Where’d you lose them? Over there on that dark vacant lot. Then why are you looking here? The light is better over here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment